|
Final
Experimental Results
With the changes described on the previous
page, the students achieved success within a week. On December 3rd,
they recorded a snap that achieved a speed near the speed of
sound. They followed up almost immediately with a snap that
exceeded the speed of sound by about 20%. This was the definitive
result that provided verification of their hypothesis. A clip of
this snap follows.
Having reached their goals, Elizabeth,
Nicolas, and Spence didn't stop there. By Christmas vacation and the
end of the fall semester, they wrote a paper on their experiment and
submitted it to The Physics Teacher journal. The article
was published in the September, '93 issue (vol. 31, p. 376).
It's important to take note of what the
student experimenters did not prove. They didn't show that the
cracking sound was produced when the tip exceeded Mach 1. They did,
however, show a weak correlation between the two events. Using a
sound trigger instead of a photogate, they investigated a number of
snaps. They found that the first image of the towel's tip was always
beyond the flip over point. This result would be expected if the
cracking sound occurred at the flip over point, since there was a
delay of about a millisecond for sound from the event to reach the
microphone and actuate the trigger.
There is a technique for finding out if the
crack occurs when the tip exceeds the speed of sound. Using shadow
photography, it is possible to photograph shock waves produced when
an object travels faster than sound. These shock waves give rise to
the sound that one perceives as a cracking sound. Bernstein, et. al.1
used this technique to show that the tip of a cracked bullwhip
produces shock waves.
Addendum
The tip of a towel undergoes a tremendous
acceleration as it is flipping over. An examination of the frame
above shows that the speed of the tip nearly doubles from the 3rd to
the 5th image. That's an increase of about 200 m/s in a
ten-thousandth of a second. The average acceleration is 200 m/s ÷
0.0001 s = 2 x 106 m/s². That's two hundred thousand
times greater than the acceleration of an object falling to the
ground. How is it possible for an ordinary human to impart such a
huge acceleration to a towel or a bullwhip, causing a portion of it
to exceed the speed of sound?
There are probably a couple of things that
make this possible. Consider Newton's 2nd law, a = F/m.
This says that the acceleration of an object increases directly with
the total force acting on it and decreases with the mass of the
object. For the towel, the force is provided by the way in which the
towel is snapped. Not only must the towel snapper throw the towel
forward, but she must also yank back on it at just the right
instant, presumably the time when the tip begins its flip. This jerk
would greatly increase the tension in the tip. The mass of the
object is not well defined, since it's not clear how much of the
towel that one should consider to be the tip. However, the mass is
small, and the amount of mass in a given length of the towel
decreases the closer one gets to the tip. At the very end, there are
only fibers. Such small masses can be given huge accelerations
by moderate forces. A mass of a tenth of a gram, for example,
requires a force of 200 N (about 45 pounds) to impart an
acceleration of 2 x 106 m/s². Even a child can
produce that large a force for a short period of time.
The tension in the tip of the towel also
contributes to fraying. The tension forces between parts of the
towel pull it apart. The speed achieved by the tip may also help
explain why it stings you if it hits just right. When the
fast-moving tip strikes, it is decelerated rapidly by the part of
your body that is struck. Your body exerts a large force to slow the
towel. By Newton's 3rd law, the towel exerts a force of equal size
on you. That force is concentrated over a very small area of your
skin and produces a sharp pain. We don't recommend experimenting
with this phenomenon.
One more interesting observation about towel
snapping is that it seems to be easier to get the towel to crack
when it is wet. Perhaps this observation is simply a consequence of
the many towel flipping experiments that are done in gym
class. However, there is probably some truth to it. A towel is
more massive when wet than dry. The drag force exerted by the air
when trying to snap the towel may be more important for a dry towel.
Thus, it may be easier to give a wet towel a large acceleration.
Moreover, the tip of a wet towel will shed water quickly. As
mentioned above, the less massive the tip, the larger its
acceleration will be.
Whether or not the previous explanation is
correct, the students used a dry towel for most of their
experiments. For example, the snap above was done with a dry towel.
|